Rhetorical Analysis Of The Tamarisk Hunter - 1757 Words

Brian Wiest Professor Loren Eason Writing 37 6 November 2017 Rhetorical Analysis In â€Å"The Tamarisk Hunter,† author Paolo Bacigalupe elaborates on the theory of Trickle Down Economics. The Trickle-Down theory claims that by giving more freedom and power to wealthy sources, individuals will become able to contribute more to society. In other words, their economic involvement is theorized to advance overall societal wealth. Bacigalupe satirically approaches this theory in that he further stresses how the water and resources in the short story do not gradually reach the lower class. But rather California, representative of the upper class, hordes all of the water in the West and it by no means trickles down to those like Lolo and his†¦show more content†¦A reader cannot truly perceive the concept of inequality without analysing how those like Lolo are given very little. Due to the fact California acquires all of the water through the Colorado River, the less fortunate like Lolo are obligated to go great lengths to merely make a living. Lolo’s job requires him to remove tamarisk alongside the waterline. Tamarisks fundamentally retain water from the river to the extent that they could detrimentally affect the water supply. However, this job does not adequately support him and his wife Annie in terms of water, therefore they need to illegally smuggle it. The theory of trickle down economics infers that there is an advancement of overall resources for all individuals, and unmistakably that is not the case. The water does not trickle down to individuals like Lolo, consequently they are nearly mandated to steal it. The author deliberately attaches the concept of the allocation of water, given in and of itself, the term trickle down is synonymous with water. Bacigalupe is showing the reader that if this economic theory benefitted all of society, then there would not be members of the lower class struggling to survive. Additionally, Lolo faces no punishment for stealing water, which essentially means that thievery is somewhat warranted; the author expects those who are